Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Beef

Politics Super Thread

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, DD: OG said:

Hillary will just blame it on the Russians.

Shit is crazy aint it?

 

That bitch has legit ties to Putin...and is corrupt as hell,  but has convinced some very stupid liberals that it's Trump with the ties to Putin.........and she's not corrupt.......it's just Russia trying to influence our election.           It's like a bad movie plot. 

She is going to end up getting her liberal supporters so riled up with all this "Russia = Boogie man" drama......that she's basically going to be obligated to start a war with Russia asap,  if she wins the election.     It's not like she can just say - "Oh......Russia?  lololol..  They are not a threat at all."

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Beef   Brother,  you see the new O'keefe video?    

 

I watched it.........and the general vibe I got from their message was something appalling...  it was..

Rich white people know what is best for black people......an if any black person dares to have a different opinion.....  then those stupid black people are fucked up in the head.

  • Pink Pussy 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pox said:

@Beef   Brother,  you see the new O'keefe video?    

 

I watched it.........and the general vibe I got from their message was something appalling...  it was..

Rich white people know what is best for black people......an if any black person dares to have a different opinion.....  then those stupid black people are fucked up in the head.

Yep, that's exactly what it illustrated.

  • Pink Pussy 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beef said:

Yep, that's exactly what it illustrated.

 

I was offended and I'm not black.       It was cringe worthy.

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Pox said:

 

I was offended and I'm not black.       It was cringe worthy.

Do you have the video link? I'd love to see it!

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kevo said:

Do you have the video link? I'd love to see it!

 

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kevo said:

Wow! 

It is disgusting shit,  isn't it?         It's the audacity.........not so much that rich white people think they know what is best for black people.,  because rich people of all shapes and sizes believe they know what is best for everyone......  but when they shit on and demean any black person that dares to stray away from whatever the rich white person is preaching.         Shit is racist as hell and creates the atmosphere of "TRAITOR TO YOUR RACE!!!!  ""

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Pox said:

It is disgusting shit,  isn't it?         It's the audacity.........not so much that rich white people think they know what is best for black people.,  because rich people of all shapes and sizes believe they know what is best for everyone......  but when they shit on and demean any black person that dares to stray away from whatever the rich white person is preaching.         Shit is racist as hell and creates the atmosphere of "TRAITOR TO YOUR RACE!!!!  ""

It's unfreakingbelieveable. 

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This shit is absolutely fucking ridiculous!

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/grade-point/wp/2016/12/10/college-instructor-tells-students-trumps-election-was-an-act-of-terrorism/

Like many Americans, Olga Perez Stable Cox has strong feelings about the outcome of this year’s presidential election.

Unlike many Americans, her job offers the convenience of a captive audience with whom she can share those feelings.

Cox, a professor at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, Calif., did exactly that days after the election while standing in front of her students in a class — unleashing a multi-minute, hyperbole-filled harangue in which she called Donald Trump’s election an “act of terrorism,” referred to the president-elect as a “white supremacist” and said “we have been assaulted.”

Cox — a psychology professor who teaches a class on human sexuality — referred to Vice President-elect Mike Pence as “one of the most anti-gay humans in the country.” She also told her students that the nation is as divided now as it was “in Civil War times.”


“First of all, we are the majority; more of us voted to not have that kind of leadership, and we didn’t win because of the way our electoral college is set up, but we are the majority, and that’s helping me to feel better,” she said. “I’m relieved that we live in California. It is one of the best states and I love that and I love living here, but I’m especially proud of our legislature who did put out a message.”

Cox’s comments were recorded by a conservative student in her class who found her statements offensive and decided to share the video with the Orange Coast College Republicans, according Joshua Recalde-Martinez, a political science major and president of the campus Republicans group.

Recalde-Martinez said his group decided to publicize the video this week after OCC President Dennis Harkins failed to address Cox’s behavior or respond to the group’s complaint “in a timely manner.” Recalde-Martinez said a handful of conservative students were present for Cox’s comments and many felt ostracized by her words and afraid that their grades might be affected by freely speaking their minds.

Related: This airline passenger’s pro-Trump rant was caught on video. Now he’s banned from Delta.

The student who filmed the video has asked to remain anonymous for fear of facing retribution in Cox’s classroom, Recalde-Martinez said.

The Orange Coast College Republicans plan to file a formal complaint with the school and have hired an attorney, Shawn Steele, who is a past chairman of the California Republican Party.

Steele told the Orange County Register that Cox is using her power as a grade-determining instructor to “basically scare and shame students.”


“It’s alarming,” he said. “It’s scaremongering. It’s irrational. It’s a rant. And it doesn’t belong in the classroom.”

Attempts to reach Cox were not immediately successful.

Steele sent the following letter to Harkins, the school president:

2z3phkh.jpg

Recalde-Martinez said Cox’s rhetoric ignores the diversity of opinion that exists on a college campus, even in a liberal state such as California, where Hillary Clinton received 8,753,788 votes to Trump’s 4,483,810.

“This is a place that prides itself on being a diverse student college, and her comments go against all of that,” he said. “You’re dealing with a diverse population, and when she states that ‘we are the majority,’ she’s not taking into account that there may be Republican students in he class of over 200 students — she’s not being inclusive.”

Related: ‘This is beyond politics’: Vandals destroy 9/11 memorial on the Occidental College campus

Recalde-Martinez said his group will continue to protest Cox’s comments until the professor faces “some corrective measures,” such as anger management classes, and offers an apology to all of her students. He said the College Republicans are not calling for her to be fired.


“She is — to my knowledge — a tenured professor and I think that’s an extreme measure,” he said. “If you’re able to educate her that a classroom is for education and not for indoctrination, I think something good will come from it.”

“I hope she will be a professional professor once again,” he added.

Cox’s name has been added to a controversial website called “Professor Watchlist,” which lists the names of about 200 academics from across the country accused by a conservative group of advancing “leftist propaganda” and discriminating “against conservative students.”

As The Post’s Valerie Strauss reported, lists of supposedly threatening academics are nothing new, but “Professor Watchlist” is one of the latest, having been unveiled last month. Critics have said it is an assault on academic freedom.

As Strauss reported:

“The watch list is a project of the nonprofit organization Turning Point USA, which, according to its website, is a national movement that seeks to “educate students about the importance of fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets.” The nonprofit’s founder and executive director is 23-year-old Charlie Kirk, who, according to the [Arlington Heights, Ill.,] Daily Herald, graduated from Wheeling High School in Illinois and then turned down an invitation to attend Baylor University and took some education classes at Harper College in Palatine, Ill., while he founded the nonprofit. Kirk spoke at the 2016 Republican National Convention.”
Juan Gutierrez, director of marketing and public relations at OCC, said school officials are aware of the video and are “looking into the matter.”

In particular, he said, officials want to understand the context in which Cox’s comments were made and whether her statements were a response to a question or part of a larger discussion. He said it was important to recognize the rights of the students as well as the professor.

“Instructors and professors enjoy academic freedom to challenge their students, and it may make people uncomfortable, and that’s how you get a spirited dialogue,” Gutierrez told The Post. “We support a respectful discourse. The purpose of the college experience is to share different perspectives on these complex issues.”


Gutierrez said Cox has been a professor at OCC for more than 20 years.

Related: ‘I voted for Trump! You lost!’: White Starbucks customer accuses barista of ‘discrimination’

Rob Schneiderman, president of the Coast Federation of Educators, a part of the American Federation of Teachers that represents OCC’s faculty, told the Orange Country Register that Cox’s speech is a protected right.

He said that the student who recorded her who may have violated school and state codes — an act that could warrant punishment.

“This faculty member is known for her open and engaging ways in class, open to all sides of the issues,” Schneiderman said. “It’s unfortunate that this student chose to not engage in an open dialogue, which she encourages.”

The union posted a statement on its Facebook page defending Cox and labeling her one of the OCC community’s “most respected faculty members.”

Student reviews of Cox’s class going back as far as 2007 were consistently positive, with anonymous praise for her guest speakers and lectures.

“Awesome teacher, loved the class!” one student wrote. “Only class where I’ve attended every day! Take her :)”

“AWESOME IN EVERY WAY!” another wrote. “It opens you up and you learn so much about yourself. Take her advance class, you take field trips. She is super nice and helpful if you need to talk to her.”

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe you should stop being so offended by everything. Feelings aren't in vogue anymore. Damn pussy CJW's (Conservative Justice Warriors)

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Willy Mo said:

Maybe you should stop being so offended by everything. Feelings aren't in vogue anymore. Damn pussy CJW's (Conservative Justice Warriors)

Why shouldn't I be offended by a professor bullying her students into what to think or feel?

Damn SALL's (Sore Ass Loser Liberals)

  • Pink Pussy 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kevo said:

Why shouldn't I be offended by a professor bullying her students into what to think or feel?

Damn SALL's (Sore Ass Loser Liberals)

Who has the sore ass? The guy admitted to being offended right? 

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Willy Mo said:

Who has the sore ass? The guy admitted to being offended right? 

The professor in this case.

Dumbass liberals apparently think it's ok to bully students as long as it furthers the leftist cause.

  • Pink Pussy 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well looky here....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/michigan-audit-significant-mismatches-detroit-vote-220357371--election.html

quote:


LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan's elections bureau ordered an investigation Monday into substantial ballot discrepancies in a small portion of Detroit's voting precincts, after the discovery of a polling place where 300 people voted but only 50 ballots were properly sealed in a container. 

Since learning of the issue last week during Michigan's presidential recount, state officials have learned of similar "significant mismatch" problems at roughly 20 of Detroit's 490 precincts, said Fred Woodhams, a spokesman for Republican Secretary of State Ruth Johnson. He said there is no reason to think votes were not counted and the differences would not have affected Republican Donald Trump's narrow victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton in the state. 

Clinton won 95 percent of Detroit's vote.


quote:

 


Many precincts could not be recounted, however — in Detroit and elsewhere — because the number of ballots in a sealed container did not match the number of voter names recorded in the poll book. In such cases, the election night totals stood. 

It is not uncommon for there to be slight inconsistencies, typically due to human error. 

"But when there's a significant mismatch, that's especially concerning," Woodhams said. 

The ballots in question will be taken to the state capital, Lansing, for review. The investigation will take about three weeks.

quote:


The Detroit precincts are among those that couldn’t be counted during a statewide presidential recount that began last week and ended Friday following a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court. 

The recount problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn’t recount votes in 392 of the city’s 662 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. State law that bars recounts for unbalanced precincts or ones with broken seals.


quote:


Republican state senators last week called for an investigation in Wayne County, including one precinct where a Detroit ballot box contained only 50 of the 306 ballots listed in a poll book, according to an observer for Trump. 

City officials have told state officials that ballots in that precinct were never taken out of a locked bin below the voting machine tabulator on Election Day, said Secretary of State spokesman Fred Woodhams. 

“That’s what we’ve been told, and we’ll be wanting to verify it,” Woodhams said. “At any rate, this should not have happened.” 

The state is not calling the audit an investigation, “but based on what we find, it could lead to more,” he said.


quote:


Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES 

LINK / 

Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work the day of the election. Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected. 

Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice.


quote:


In one Detroit Precinct, a recount team was given a box of ballots with an unbroken seal where everything appeared proper and in place. The tag on the box said there were 306 ballots. The book said 306, and the ticket said 306, so that means there should be 306 paper ballots on the box. When they pulled out the ballots, there were exactly FIFTY paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. The official canvasser approved count for this precinct was 306. For FIFTY ballots.


  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

392 fucking voting precincts in Detroit had voting box seals and log books not match up with the number of paper ballots actually in the box.

In that one district, they had 50 ballots account for 306 votes.

And 95% of votes in Detroit went for Clinton.

Fucking cheaters.  And Trump still won the state.

  • Pink Pussy 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine Hillary is outraged knowing election fraud took place in Detroit.

  • Pink Pussy 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can take this assertion that she won the popular vote and shove it.

Thats 10's of thousands of fraudulent votes in just one Dem city.

This is what they do.  Cheat, cry, and lie.

  • Pink Pussy 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×